Ok, so with the big news about the Muslims who planned to kill American soldiers, of course there will be those who are offended and are going to complain. As Michelle Malkin points out, CAIR is trolling for "victims." But what's New Jersey's most prominent Muslim saying?
But when the government says `Islamic militants,' it sends a message to the public that Islam and militancy are synonymous."
Don't equate actions with religion
That's Sohail Mohammed. Know what, Sohail? It's not the government that's equating actions with religions, it's THE MUSLIMS. The government didn't claim that they were Muslims wanting to kill Americans, THEY DID. Stop crying that your religion is the victim when it's the members of your religion that are causing the problems.
So what else has Sohail said?
It's a disgrace to link a religion with these terrorists.
That was Sohail in June of 2006, talking about the 9/11 hijackers. Once again, Sohail, it's the terrorists who are linking religion to their own actions this time. It's not people sitting around pointing fingers, saying "Oh, they have foreign names, so it's Muslims." It's the MUSLIMS who are planning to commit these actions IN THE NAME OF ISLAM.
And yes, this is the same Sohail that complained about a television show ("24") that showed Muslim terrorists:
Somewhere, some lunatic out there watching this will do something to an innocent American Muslim because he believes what he saw on TV
Gee, Sohail, you mean like these Muslim Extremists terrorists that are working "independently" and are modeling their own actions after al-Queda all over the world? Perhaps, Sohail, it's the MUSLIMS who are modeling their actions after what they're seeing in the world to attack AMERICANS and not the opposite, as you claim.
Sohail, it's time for you to shut up and go back to your business. Stop trying to be the voice of Muslims in New Jersey, because your own religious brothers are making you look foolish.
I have just one question: Why should their religion get a pass when no one else's does?
When the Davidians in Waco did what they did, nobody complained about religion being an angle, when Jonestown happened... that was religion, too... abortion clinics bombed by evangelicans... well, that was religion,too...
And those are only the instances I can pull off the cuff...
I wouldn't be too hard on these rag-heads. To quote Billy Bob Thornton (aka David Crockett)"A little harmony never hurt anybody." So I've decided, what these people need is a BBQ sandwich. Yessir're, a little BBQ might add harmony to their lives, you know, smooth out the rough edges. You can never tell, they might even go back to using sheets for what they were intended. A new holiday proposal, BBQ Day in Islamo Quarters, nothing like a little harmony!!
Good point, Steph -- but that's today's PC environment -- you're not allowed to criticize religion unless it's Christianity (or Jewish).
And Jeff? You know that's a hate crime, what you said right there, don't you? If the Democrats in Congress have their way, they seriously want to put you in jail just for saying that!
Well Ogre, A little BBQ for Dems might just adjust their attitude as well, as I said, a little harmony never hurt.
I'm all for harmony -- if they'd stop trying to kill me!
The day will come -- given recent developments, it might be soon -- when the majority of Americans realize that a "religion" is not just any old creed that calls itself a religion. At that point, the necessary parallels between Islam and Nazism will be drawn. The consequences won't be pretty.
So you're saying my snake-worshipping cult doesn't get special rights and permissions?
I hope you're right.
You people, your so unpure, you need a new way of living.
Which people would that be? And what, specifically, is "unpure" to you? And how, exactly, do you propose to enforce your personal version of "purity?"
Well Ogre, what did I tell you, some folks are in need of harmony & old Almani seems just the candidate. Oh, and by the way Alm (you don't mind if I use the shortened form of address?)a point of grammatical correctness: "your [sic] so impure" should read "you're so impure." You see in the English language "your" is a personal pronoun while "you're" is a contraction of "you are" which is the subject & verb of "your" sentence. Ah the English language, what a convoluted but beautiful old thing.
I'm guessing Al won't be back. Mind if I call you Al?
RE: Al won't be back. Pity, I'd grown rather fond of his accent.
You Amercians, with your power and might, can't even see your dogs, and unpure.
I can see my dog. He's right over there. He's looking at me right now. I think he wants a treat -- or maybe to go play.
American liberals, Socialists, are in a world of there own. We love it because they give we free money $, free food, give we free education in there liberal colleges, and free jobs where we don't even have to work, sleep all day and collect a free money. I love liberal democrate,
We love Ogre, free doggies.
What's going on here? I'm not a dog.
Ah, but are you an unpure dog, Brian?
You must convert to the richest way of life, be pure, convert to muslim.